The Future of the Neo-Brandeisian Movement

Stacy Mitchell writes that the Neo-Brandeisian movement is as strong as ever. Despite its champions, Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan and Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter, exiting their posts, grassroots momentum is only growing. Today, it’s in state legislatures and attorneys general offices where the movement is now advancing—and where future antitrust policy is being shaped.

Michelle Meagher writes that to preserve its contributions to the marketplace of ideas about antitrust, the Neo-Brandeisian movement must build out an infrastructure that archives its ideas and makes them accessible to the public. It must also continue to make its case for its core contributions to this marketplace, including on bigness and per se rules.

John B. Kirkwood writes that the future of Neo-Brandeisian movement must focus on three fronts: refining its approach to the consumer welfare standard, which it initially rejected but then used when in power; continuing to influence the monopolization cases against Big Tech and the Federal Trade Commission’s non-compete rule; and configuring the principles to govern competition in the economy’s next great tech frontier: artificial intelligence.