type here...

Featured Stories

Defending the Merger Efficiency Defense: A Response to Herbert Hovenkamp

Nancy Rose and Jonathan Sallet
Nancy L. Rose and Jonathan Sallet respond to a recent article by Herbert Hovenkamp, in which he argues that the merger-efficiencies defense, which requires merging parties to demonstrate competitive benefits of a merger in order to rebut a prima facie case of harm presented by plaintiffs, is too burdensome and runs contrary to empirical evidence.

Recent Authors

Featured Stories

ProMarket's newsletter

Join our weekly email newsletter.

Announcements


October 15: Making Markets Work for People: Digital Platform Regulation with Fiona Scott Morton

Load more

The publication of the Stigler Center at The University of Chicago Booth School of Business

ProMarket is dedicated to discussing how competition tends to be subverted by special interests. The posts represent the opinions of their writers, not necessarily those of the University of Chicago, the Booth School of Business, or its faculty. For more information, please visit ProMarket Policy.