Webinar: Monopolies and the Rise of Nazism in Germany

Also Read

Tech Monopolies Are the Reason the US Now Has a TikTok Problem

Tech platforms like Facebook say we should protect, empower, and celebrate their concentrated power for the sake of America’s national security. But...

Should We Defund the Police? A New Capitalisn’t Reading List

In this episode of the Capitalisn't podcast, Kate and Luigi take an economist's look at the concept of defunding the police.

“Alberto Alesina Always Knew Where The Big Ideas Were”

Harvard economist Alberto Alesina passed away at 63. Paola Giuliano, UCLA professor and Alesina's co-author, recalls his intellectual and human legacy: "He...

Why Economic Predictions Are Useless Right Now

The Covid-19 crisis is unprecedented in its global scope and open-ended, uncontrollable progress. By their very nature, the models that economists often...

The Stigler Center’s Monopolies and Politics Workshop Webinar Series explores some of the themes we’ll explore at our 2020 Antitrust and Competition Conference: University of Michigan professor Daniel Crane and BIICL’s Senior Research Fellow Liza Lovdahl Gormsen discuss whether industrial cartels played a role in facilitating the rise of Nazism in Germany. The conversation is moderated by Stigler Center Fellow Filippo Lancieri.

Watch a Stigler Center webinar with University of Michigan professor Daniel Crane and Liza Lovdahl Gormsen, a  Senior Research Fellow at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL), on whether industrial cartels played a role in facilitating the rise of Nazism in Germany, the subsequent attempts to reorganize the German industrial base, and whether the historical evidence can inform antitrust reform in the 21st century.

The conversation is moderated by Stigler Center Fellow Filippo Lancieri.

Daniel Crane is the Frederick Paul Furth Sr. Professor of Law. He served as the associate dean for faculty and research from 2013 to 2016. He teaches contracts, antitrust, antitrust and intellectual property, and legislation and regulation. He previously was a professor of law at Yeshiva University’s Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and a visiting professor at New York University School of Law and the University of Chicago Law School. Professor Crane’s work has appeared in the University of Chicago Law Review, the California Law Review, the Michigan Law Review, the Georgetown Law Journal, and the Cornell Law Review, among other journals. He is the author of several books on antitrust law, including Antitrust (Aspen, 2014), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (Oxford UP, 2013), and The Institutional Structure of Antitrust Enforcement (Oxford UP, 2011).

Liza Lovdahl Gormsen is a Senior Research Fellow in Competition Law and Director of the Competition Law Forum at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. Liza is a Non-Governmental Advisor to the International Competition Network (ICN), appointed by the UK Competition and Markets Authority. She is a member of the ICN Unilateral Conduct Working Group and the Agency Effectiveness Working Group. Liza sits on the advisory board of the Journal of Antitrust Enforcement (OUP) edited by Professor Bill Kovacic and Professor Ariel Ezrachi. She is a Board Member of the Open Markets Institute in Washington DC. Liza is the author of A Principled Approach to Abuse of Dominance (CUP, 2010) and European State Aid and Tax Rulings (Elgar, 2019).

Filippo Lancieri (moderator) is a research fellow at the Stigler Center and a JSD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School. His research interests include antitrust, data protection and the political economy of regulation more broadly and his JSD thesis explores the challenges of regulating digital markets. Filippo’s work has appeared in the University of Chicago Law Review, the Antitrust Law Journal and the Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, among others. Filippo also coordinated the Stigler Center Committee on Digital Platforms.

ProMarket is dedicated to discussing how competition tends to be subverted by special interests. The posts represent the opinions of their writers, not necessarily those of the University of Chicago, the Booth School of Business, or its faculty. For more information, please visit ProMarket Blog Policy.

Latest article

The Monopoly Harms That Antitrust Keeps Missing

In his new book Monopolized, journalist David Dayen tells the stories of individuals who have suffered at the hands of monopolists, showing...

Special Interests Hide Behind Regulatory Myths

Three myths about federal regulation help prevent much of the public, and many experts, from realizing how many regulations serve to promote...

The Persuasive Effect of Fox News: How Increases in Fox News Viewership Reduced Compliance With Social Distancing Guidelines

Using zip-code level data on Fox News viewership and individual cellphone movement data, a recent study finds that increasing the local viewership...

Bethany McLean’s Weekend Reading List: Eastman Kodak, Private Equity Hospitals, and America’s First Female Recession

Corruption, lobbying, corporate malfeasance, and frauds: a weekly unconventional selection of must-read articles by investigative journalist Bethany McLean. 

Tech Monopolies Are the Reason the US Now Has a TikTok Problem

Tech platforms like Facebook say we should protect, empower, and celebrate their concentrated power for the sake of America’s national security. But...